Skip to main contentSkip to fit check
— back to top

The netherlands legal source guide

Is licensing company records legal in the Netherlands?

A preliminary reading guide to licensing company records in the Netherlands. Start with the legal sources and take your own advice before sharing records or signing.

General information, not legal advice; take your own advice.

Via Nordic MarTech, an independent referrer. We may receive a referral fee; you pay nothing.

Short answer

There is no blanket clearance. The company must establish the relevant rights and authority and separately review privacy, confidentiality, contracts and the proposed recipients. This preliminary guide identifies questions and sources; it does not approve a collection or a licence.

  • Trace rights in employee, contractor, customer and third-party material.
  • Review personal data and confidentiality separately from copyright.
  • Check current versions, amendments and commencement with your adviser.
  • Only the buyer and your authorised decision maker can agree a licence.

1. Auteurswet and company authority

Start with the Auteurswet for copyright, the maker, employment-related provisions and exploitation agreements. Ask who can grant the particular rights and whether signed assignments or existing contracts limit the proposed licence. Company possession is not enough.

Read the legal text

2. Database rights and reuse

The Databankenwet is a separate source for database protection. Review investment, database maker, extraction and reutilisation questions alongside copyright. Text-and-data-mining exceptions and rights reservations need their own review before relying on them for commercial AI use.

3. AVG, national implementation and transfers

The GDPR is commonly called the AVG in the Netherlands. Read its lawful-basis, purpose and special-category provisions alongside the Uitvoeringswet AVG. Map overseas recipients and onward access; a licence cannot itself provide every privacy permission.

Read the legal text

4. Confidentiality, officeholders and the written agreement

Review client, platform, confidentiality and professional obligations independently of copyright. For closed or winding-down companies, an authorised officeholder should lead the review. Personal data in insolvency estates needs its own lawful basis; your officeholder and the buyer decide.

Document the records covered, permitted purpose, recipients, exclusivity, retention and end-of-licence treatment. This source guide is not clearance to upload records or a substitute for advice on the proposed agreement.

Read the legal text

Questions to take to your own adviser

Use this as a preparation list, not as a compliance determination. Do not send company records or personal details to Nordic MarTech.

  • Who owns or controls each right needed for the proposed use?
  • Which local privacy, employment, professional or sector rules apply?
  • Do existing client, contractor and platform contracts permit the disclosure?
  • Where will recipients process records and allow onward access?
  • Has your adviser reviewed the current law and proposed written agreement?
  • If the company is closed, which officeholder has authority to proceed?

Nordic MarTech is an independent referrer. We never hold, move, clean, value or sell your records. Any application and record review take place directly with the buyer.

Last checked: